precedent SIN AFTER FAILURE IN HISTORY OF ARGENTINA
THE SUPREME COURT. LED BY THE JUDGE
as President, Ricardo Lorenzetti. CARLOS
FAYT., EUGENIO ZAFARONI.
ARE SOME OF THE NAMES THAT ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS ABERRATION OF LAWS
VIA DARIAN FREE TO DRUG USE, SUCH AS MARIJUANA
, ACIDS, COCAINE, PACO, AND ALL THAT S COME AFTER THE ADDICTS NEW FUTURE, WILL know and experience.
The Supreme Court ruled today in favor of marijuana possession for personal consumption. As expected, the high court declared unconstitutional the enforcement of narcotics to convict five youths were arrested in 2006 in Rosario with minimal amounts of the substance and, therefore, acquitted ...
TO DECLARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PUNISHMENT OF THE USE OF MARIJUANA IN ADULTS ..
The case Arriola In this case,
five youths were convicted because in his possession were found three marijuana cigarettes, a move that was challenged as unconstitutional. Were initially charged both sellers (dealers) as buyers of smaller quantities for personal consumption. The Court had already upheld the conviction and Monica Arriola Sebastián Vázquez for selling drugs, but now acquitted the five men charged with possession. During the investigation of the case, these people were not more that "parsley", but nevertheless they are investigated in intelligence work. Some of them were arrested in the street after buying, with a few grams of marijuana over.
Rosarinos WITH THESE YOUNG PEOPLE WILL NOT BLAME THIS JUDGEMENT OR SENTENCE.
23,737
The law provides for fines and up to 12 years in prison "without authorization" to deliver drugs at no cost and a higher penalty if you do "for value"
But Article 14 was the so-called Drug Act which was reviewed by the Court in the case involving Gustavo Perez, Marcelo Acedo, Mario Villarreal, Gabriel Medina and Leandro Cortejarena. As drug use is not punished, what the Court decided was the constitutionality of the second part of Article 14 of the ley.La rules impose penalty of one month to two years in prison for possessing narcotic drugs "because of its low amount and other circumstances beyond doubt that the possession is for personal use. " The assessment of when the amount is "low" and "circumstances" of the concrete facts "will always be subject to judicial review," the sources said
Under current regulations, specifically Article 14.2 Drugs Act, possession of small quantities of any drug is punishable by up to two years in prison.
BUT WITH THE NEW RESOLUTION WILL BE ALL AND ALL
square one
CONSUMER happy with this new resolution.
PART OF THE TEXT OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT
A
891.XL
IV APPEAL OF FACTS.
ARRIOLA SEBASTIAN AND OTHER CAUSE NUMBER / 9080
Buenos Aires. Viewed
cars: "Appeal in fact deduced by the official
defender Gustavo Alberto Perez, Ezequiel Marcelo Acedo,
Mario Alberto Villarreal, Gabriel Alejandro Medina and Andrés Leandro Cortejarena
the cause Arriola, Sebastian and other s /
Case No. 9080, to decide on their provenance.
Considering
1) That this case began on January 19, 2006, following
reported by the Chief of
Rosario Argentina Federal Police, realizing that different
worked in the pre-trial investigations
dependency violation of law arose 23,737
that all detainees had been in sporadic contact with a farm located
on Forest Street near the corner of Nicaragua, which had observed the movements
typical
selling drugs at retail.
Under this instruction was available
summary that was delegated to the prosecutor on duty, who
function of monitoring and surveillance tasks undertaken by
prevention, images captured and recorded on a video cassette
who joined the case, and on the evidence emerging
copies of the summaries accumulated in the process,
contended that it could be inferred that at the farm alluded to a subject
be devoted to the marketing of drugs. In this role
requested and obtained an order of
search, registration and kidnapping that took place on 26 February 2006
, as arising from the minutes that looks
to fs. 63/64 and later, the April 27, 2006 (pages
119/122). Also under the various measures taken in the process
summary records were joined
No. 1268-1205 "Fares, Gustavo Alberto s / Law 23,737"
ARGENTINA IS NOT READY FOR THIS And similar laws that DEN
VIA FREE CONSUMER AND NEW CONSUMER
0 comments:
Post a Comment